Kennedy's 2024 Vision Clashes with Libertarian Ideals: A Collision of Progressivism and Freedom
Exploring the Divergent Paths of Economic Policies, Social Issues, and Government's Role in the Hunt for Individual Freedom
As we hear more discussion regarding independent presidential candidate, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s potential for getting on the ballot in all 50 states via the Libertarian Party; I thought there was value where they differ. Unfortunately for both, it is like oil and water, and as I stated on X on January 27th, it ain’t going to happen. He’s reportedly created his political party in California called We The People, though it is not yet listed on the official California Elections office website.
The prospect hit the national stage on Smerconish’s Saturday morning show on CNN and the idea of a Kennedy being the Libertarian Party’s presidential nominee went viral on social media, trending on X (formerly Twitter). The overall consensus from Libertarians was “HELL NO.” Though Kennedy has spoken at PorkFest and is scheduled to speak at the Libertarian Party of California’s state convention next month, it is unlikely Kennedy will be the next LP presidential nominee — even though it is the only clear path for him to have a mathematical chance to get into the White House.
Firstly, the Kennedy 2024 policy page is a curious journey into a mix of more government involvement in American’s lives, whereas the Libertarian Party’s platform is about less government and more freedom.
Economic Policies:
Kennedy's economic policies seem to tread a familiar path, advocating for job creation, government-controlled wage pricing, and economic growth via corporate welfare. Although he leans towards a more centrist approach, his policy suggestions often contradict the Libertarian approach. For example, Kennedy suggests limiting natural gas exports, forcing businesses to pay a minimum wage of $15 per hour, and interfering with the free market on many levels. The Libertarian Party's platform promotes free-market principles so much of Kennedy’s economic policies are in direct opposition to the LP. The LP advocates minimal government interference in economic matters, emphasizing individual choice and voluntary cooperation. The only economic policy that comes close is when Kennedy states, “Clean out the corruption in Washington, D.C., which funnels so much of our nation’s wealth to giant corporations and billionaires.” This statement resonates with Libertarians as most are strongly opposed to crony capitalism.
Social Issues:
Kennedy has a strong focus on government-forced equality, justice, and healthcare. It leans towards a progressive stance, aligning with mainstream Democratic Party values. Libertarians, on the other hand, take a more government-hands-off approach to social issues. The emphasis is on individual liberty and the right to make personal choices, even if those choices may be unconventional. Where Kennedy and the Libertarian Party may agree is on civil rights.
Government's Role:
Kennedy's policies suggest an active role for the government in addressing societal challenges, reflecting a more interventionist approach. His respect for property rights is not as strong as Libertarians, who hold property rights sacrosanct. Libertarians advocate for a limited government that primarily protects individual rights. The belief is that individuals and voluntary associations can address societal issues more efficiently than centralized governmental authority.
In the swirling maelstrom of politics, Kennedy and the Libertarian Party represent divergent paths – one embracing a blend of tradition and progressivism, and the other, an unapologetic call for individual freedom in all aspects of life. It's a clash of ideologies, my friends, and as we navigate these stormy political seas, may the ink flow freely and the ideas spark a revolution. Cheers to shaking things up!