Florida's Amendment 2: Fishing and Hunting Rights on the Ballot
Debate swirls as voters weigh preserving tradition versus ecological concerns.
Florida voters will be voting on another constitutional amendment to the Florida Constitution this coming November regarding hunting and fishing in the state. Amendment 2 is one of six constitutional amendments on the November 5, 2024 ballot and this amendment is put forth by the Florida legislature.
This amendment would enshrine the right to hunt and fish into Florida’s Constitution, in addition to existing Florida statutes dealing with hunting and fishing in the state. The proposed amendment looks to preserve forever fishing and hunting, including by the use of traditional methods, as a public right and preferred means of responsibly managing and controlling fish and wildlife. It specifies that the amendment does not limit the authority granted to the state government’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission under Section of Article IV of the State Constitution.
Supporters contend that hunting and fishing are deeply ingrained cultural practices, deeply rooted in Florida's heritage and way of life. By constitutionally guaranteeing these activities, proponents argue, citizens are empowered to engage in activities they enjoy nearly without restriction
Opponents argue that while hunting and fishing may have longstanding traditions, they also have the potential to disrupt ecosystems and endanger vulnerable species if hunters are allowed to hunt unfettered, and depending upon the government’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission disrupt ecosystems and endanger vulnerable species. It raises concerns about the potential for increased pressure on wildlife populations, habitat degradation, and negative ecological impacts resulting from unrestricted hunting and fishing activities.
Personally, as I wrote regarding Amendment 1, I will be voting against Amendment 2 as it has multiple potential for unintended consequences, especially when it comes to one’s property rights in the state. It is yet another government-generated proposal looking for a solution to a problem that does not exist; we have effective laws on the books already regarding hunting and fishing.
